Romain Grosjean sides with Lewis Hamilton on jewellery ban with heartwarming reason

F1 news

ROMAIN GROSJEAN has defended Lewis Hamilton as he hit again on the sport’s new jewelry guidelines.

F1 preview: A lap of the Miami Grand Prix

We use your sign-up to supply content material in methods you have consented to and to enhance our understanding of you. This may increasingly embrace adverts from us and third events primarily based on our understanding. You may unsubscribe at any time. Extra information

Romain Grosjean has claimed he wouldn’t need to race with out his marriage ceremony ring which ‘protected’ him throughout his fiery crash on the 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix as he defended Lewis Hamilton’s place. Grosjean advised the jewelry didn’t play any half in his escape after his terrifying 119mph crash in Sakhir.

Chatting with Sky Sports activities F1, Grosjean mentioned: “In all equity I did not actually take a look at it that a lot. I have been sporting my marriage ceremony ring my entire profession, my watch.

“The marriage ring did not do, the place my ring was I used to be protected. I used to be protected by my spouse. Saved by my children proper I perceive a few of it however I would not wish to race with out my marriage ceremony ring that’s large for me.”

It comes after FIA bosses have cracked down on banning jewelry at this weekend’s race. They’ve made jewelry checks and fire-proof underwear as a part of the groups’ scrutineering checks.

READ MORE: Lewis Hamilton escapes F1 ban with FIA giving him ‘grace interval’

Romain Grosjean sides with Lewis Hamilton on jewellery ban with heartwarming reason

Romain Grosjean has defended Lewis Hamilton’s stance on the jewelry saga (Picture: Getty)

It means group bosses should verify drivers have eliminated the objects earlier than they’re allowed to race. Failure to comply with the principles may lead to fines, grid penalties and even disqualification from the occasion.

Hamilton hit again in opposition to the principles in at this time’s press convention, claiming the rule was ‘pointless’.

He mentioned: “I really feel nearly prefer it’s a step backwards, for those who consider the steps we’re taking as a sport and the extra vital points and causes we have to be centered on. I feel we’ve made such nice strides as a sport. That is such a small factor. I’ve been within the sport for 16 years, I’ve been sporting jewelry for 16 years.

“Within the automobile I solely have my earrings on and my nostril ring, which I can’t even take away. It appears pointless for us to get into this spat.”

Sebastian Vettel mocks FIA ruling by sporting gray boxers in pitlane [INSIGHT]
Lewis Hamilton wears three watches as he speaks out on jewelry ban [ANALYSIS]
Lewis Hamilton to check Niels Wittich at Miami GP over jewelry saga [COMMENT]

Romain Grosjean sides with Lewis Hamilton on jewellery ban with heartwarming reason

Romain Grosjean mentioned his marriage ceremony ring protected him throughout his crash (Picture: Getty)

Grosjean’s 2020 crash is commonly used for example of why the ruleas should be launched. In his pre-event notes Wittich claimed having jewelry behind the wheel may cause ‘delay’ to medical assist in the occasion of a crash or further accidents.

Wittich mentioned: “Metallic objects, similar to jewelry, involved with the pores and skin can scale back warmth transmission safety and thus might improve the chance of burn accidents within the occasion of a fireplace. The sporting of jewelry in the course of the competitors can hinder each medical interventions in addition to subsequent analysis and remedy ought to it’s required following an accident.

“The presence of jewelry can gradual, because of the threat of “snagging”, the emergency removing of driver security tools similar to helmet, balaclava, and overalls. Within the case that medical imaging is required to tell analysis following an accident the presence of jewelry on the physique may cause important complication and delay.

“Within the worst case the presence of jewelry throughout imaging might trigger additional damage. Jewelry in and/or across the airway can pose particular further dangers ought to it turn out to be dislodged throughout an accident and both ingested or inhaled.”


Rate author
F1 News
Add a comment